ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03240
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code be changed from 2X to 1.
________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 17 May 11, the Board considered and denied applicants
original request to have his RE and separation program
designator (SPD) codes changed so that he may reenlist in the
military. He contended that he was unfairly separated for
missing deployment training and that he had no instances of
serious misconduct (i.e. driving under the influence (DUI) or
non-judicial punishment (NJP)). After reviewing all the facts
and circumstances of the case, the Board determined the
applicants discharge was carried out in accordance with the
substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and there
was no evidence of an error or injustice. For an accounting of
the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original
request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board,
see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F.
By virtue of a DD Form 149, with attachments, the applicant
requests reconsideration of his request, contending that he was
on leave getting married during the alleged missed appointment
that caused his discharge. Furthermore, the date of the alleged
missed appointment is not stated in the AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration. Finally, all his enlisted
performance reports were good, with the exception of his last
one. In support of his request for reconsideration, the
applicant provides a copy of his AF Form 418, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and
marriage certificate.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided
in support of his request, we remain unconvinced the applicant
has been a victim of an error or injustice. We have previously
determined the applicants discharge due to being denied
reenlistment was proper and in compliance with the requirements
of the governing directives. While the applicants contentions
are duly noted, his latest submission has not persuaded us
otherwise.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered the applicants
request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-03240 in Executive Session on 7 Feb 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 1 Jun 11,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, DD Form 149, dated 9 Feb 12, w/atch.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00033
The applicant contends that none of the evaluators were members of the Air Force. In accordance with AFR 39-62, Noncommissioned Officer and Airman Performance Reports, when none of the evaluators are Air Force personnel, an Air Force advisor must sign the report. Even if the reasons for the delay in filing are insufficient to excuse the delay, we may examine the facts and circumstances of the case and, if substantial evidence of error or injustice exists, waive the three year time limit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04378 1
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, the Board did not find Counsels arguments or the documentation presented sufficient to conclude that the commanders decision to deny the applicant re-enlistment lacked a sufficient basis. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. By virtue of a letter, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY1996 | BC 1996 03760 1
Based on the evidence provided, it appears the Boards previous correction in 1997 of the applicants record, changing his reentry code from 2I to 3B failed to provide the intended relief. Additionally, we note that under Air Force policy at the time, a 3B code was not to be assigned at the time of the members discharge, which in effect the previous correction did. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be changed from 2X (First-term, second- term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) to one that will allow him to enlist into another service. He was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03731
On 14 April 1999, an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, was initiated not recommending his reenlistment. The DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02448
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his rank as SGT (sergeant), instead of SRA (senior airman). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01711
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01711 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter...